Statistical Overview
The current labour landscape in the United States is characterised by a significant uptick in strikes and labour actions. According to Cornell University’s Labour Action Tracker, there has been a notable 52% increase in strikes in 2022. This statistical surge is not a mere anomaly but a manifestation of deep-rooted discontent and a desire for change among the workforce. The Bureau of Labour Statistics further corroborates this trend, providing comprehensive data on work stoppages and labour disputes that reveal a pattern of escalating  actions in recent years. By the end of August 2021, the recorded number of work stoppages (involving 1000+ workers) stood at 9. In contrast, by the equivalent time in 2022, this figure had risen to 15, and by the end of August of this year, it  had further increased to 19, marking a substantial increase of approximately 111% from 2021 to the present year. The data not only quantifies the increase in strikes but also offers a glimpse into the diverse range of industries affected, from education to healthcare to manufacturing. The increase of workdays lost to stoppages (see chart below) in 2023 is even more spectacular. 

The role of unions
Unions have been the backbone of the labour movement. They are responsible for organizing and leading strikes to advocate for workers' rights and better working conditions. In the context of the recent surge in strikes, the role of the United Auto Workers (UAW) has been particularly prominent, especially in the automotive sector. The UAW has been steadfast in its mission to represent the interests of its members, focusing on securing better wages, benefits, and working conditions. The strategies employed by the UAW involve mobilizing members, engaging in collective negotiations, and, when necessary, organizing strikes to pressure employers to address their demands. The demands of the UAW typically center around wage increases, improved benefits, and assurances regarding job security and future investments in plant operations.

Political reactions and policies
The rising tide of strikes and union activities has elicited varied political responses, with different political figures and parties expressing either support or opposition. The political discourse surrounding these labour movements has been characterized by debates on workers' rights, economic implications, and the role of unions in the modern labour market. Some political figures have voiced support for the strikes, recognizing them as a legitimate expression of workers’ grievances and a call for economic justice. They advocate for policies that bolster workers’ rights and address the underlying issues leading to labour unrest. Conversely, there has been opposition from the other side, with concerns raised about the economic repercussions of strikes and debates on the relevance and influence of unions in today’s economic landscape. The strikes and union activities have also influenced legislative and policy landscapes. Discussions on labour laws, workers' rights, and employment conditions have gained prominence, with policymakers deliberating on reforms and initiatives to address the concerns raised by workers and unions. The policy dialogues and legislative considerations reflect the significance of labour movements in shaping political agendas and influencing policy directions.

The United Auto Workers (UAW) union is currently engaged in a significant strike, marking a pivotal moment in labour history as it is the first-ever simultaneous strike at all three major automakers: General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis. This strike which initiated on September 15, 2023, involves approximately 13,000 workers walking out of assembly plants located in Michigan, Ohio, and Missouri.
Strategy and execution
The UAW has adopted a “stand-up strike” strategy, a term reminiscent of the Flint sit-down strike of 1936-1937. This strategy involves targeting a few plants initially, keeping the companies uncertain and demonstrating the union’s willingness to inflict financial pain. The union’s approach has been characterized by surprise and rapid mobilization, catching management off-guard at several plants. To worsen matters for the companies, in their anticipation and preparation for the strike, they made several miscalculations, moving parts out of the wrong plants and causing self-inflicted financial damage.
Many workers, including temporary ones, are motivated to fight for higher pay and the elimination of tiered pay structures. The workers have expressed dissatisfaction with the portrayal of their earnings in the media, clarifying that they do not earn the stated $60 or $70 an hour, with new temporary workers earning as low as $16 an hour. The ongoing strike is distinct from the 2019 strike in its scale and strategy. While the 2019 strike was primarily against General Motors, the current strike encompasses all three major automakers. The strategy in 2019 was more conventional, focusing on one company, whereas the current strike employs a more unpredictable and dynamic approach, targeting multiple companies and keeping them guessing what their next move will be. The ongoing strike has had a substantial impact on the production of popular vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and the Ford Bronco. The automakers have expressed disappointment in the UAW’s decision to strike, emphasizing their efforts to reach a fair agreement. The strike has also garnered support and attention from political figures, with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders scheduled to appear at a rally.