Disclaimer
This marketing document has been issued by Bank Syz Ltd. It is not intended for distribution to, publication, provision or use by individuals or legal entities that are citizens of or reside in a state, country or jurisdiction in which applicable laws and regulations prohibit its distribution, publication, provision or use. It is not directed to any person or entity to whom it would be illegal to send such marketing material. This document is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation for the subscription, purchase, sale or safekeeping of any security or financial instrument or for the engagement in any other transaction, as the provision of any investment advice or service, or as a contractual document. Nothing in this document constitutes an investment, legal, tax or accounting advice or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate for an investor's particular and individual circumstances, nor does it constitute a personalized investment advice for any investor. This document reflects the information, opinions and comments of Bank Syz Ltd. as of the date of its publication, which are subject to change without notice. The opinions and comments of the authors in this document reflect their current views and may not coincide with those of other Syz Group entities or third parties, which may have reached different conclusions. The market valuations, terms and calculations contained herein are estimates only. The information provided comes from sources deemed reliable, but Bank Syz Ltd. does not guarantee its completeness, accuracy, reliability and actuality. Past performance gives no indication of nor guarantees current or future results. Bank Syz Ltd. accepts no liability for any loss arising from the use of this document.
Related Articles
more than doubling what it was worth in October, according to the Wall Street Journal, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter.
Source: European Commission
🚨 In the wake of DeepSeek turning the entire industry on its head — and wiping nearly $600 billion off of the market cap of Nvidia in a single day — one new phrase has become table stakes for anyone wading into the DeepSeek discourse: Jevons Paradox, with traffic to its associated Wikipedia page soaring this week. 👉 Per that very Wikipedia page: “...the Jevons paradox occurs when technological advancements make a resource more efficient to use (thereby reducing the amount needed for a single application), however, as the cost of using the resource drops, overall demand increases causing total resource consumption to rise.” 👉 The original example posited by Mr. William Stanley Jevons, summarized nicely by Axios, was coal. Progress in steam engines, which enabled them to use less coal, didn’t lead to a drop in coal demand — it led to a huge rise. Though a bit of an oversimplification, that is essentially the crux of the current debate in AI: DeepSeek reportedly achieved something for a lot less money and resources than US competitors like OpenAI and Meta used. That could be interpreted in two ways: • We will therefore need fewer high-tech chips like the ones Nvidia makes, and fewer energy plants to power them (which is why power and datacenter stocks got hammered this week); • Or, and this is where the Jevons Paradox comes in, WE WILL WANT EVEN MORE 💪 The market seemed to follow the first school of thought on Monday 🐻 , but came around to the second by Tuesday 🐮 , with chip analysts and tech heavyweights, most notably Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella, citing the paradox as proof that AI use will “skyrocket.” 🚀 🚀 🚀 Source: Chartr