Straight from the Desk
Syz the moment
Live feeds, charts, breaking stories, all day long.
- All
- equities
- United States
- Macroeconomics
- Food for Thoughts
- markets
- bitcoin
- Central banks
- geopolitics
- Fixed Income
- AI
- Asia
- gold
- europe
- Commodities
- investing
- Technology
- Crypto
- technical analysis
- nvidia
- china
- oil
- ETF
- earnings
- Forex
- energy
- banking
- magnificent-7
- Volatility
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
- apple
- emerging-markets
- Middle East
- switzerland
- tesla
- amazon
- United Kingdom
- microsoft
- assetmanagement
- ethereum
- russia
- meta
- Healthcare
- Industrial-production
- ESG
- Global Markets Outlook
- bankruptcy
- Turkey
- brics
- inflation
- Market Outlook
- performance
- africa
- LLM
- Global
- Market News
- Weekly Equities
The case for a 2% Bitcoin allocation into multi-assets portfolios by Blackrock:
"So how can investors think about a bitcoin allocation? We take a risk budgeting approach: sizing the allocation based on how much it would contribute to total portfolio risk – measured by its long-run volatility and correlation to other assets (...). But from a portfolio construction perspective, it has some similarities with the “magnificent 7” group of mostly mega-cap tech stocks. Their market value – averaging $2.5 trillion in December 2024 – is similar to bitcoin’s (...) In a traditional portfolio with a mix of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, those seven stocks – if held at their current weights in the MSCI World – each account for 4% of the overall portfolio risk on average. That’s about the same share a 1-2% exposure to bitcoin would represent: Even though bitcoin’s correlation to other assets is relatively low, it’s more volatile, making its effect on total risk contribution similar overall. A bitcoin allocation would have the advantage of providing a diverse source of risk, while an overweight to the magnificent 7 would add to existing risk and to portfolio concentration. Why not more than 2%? A larger bitcoin allocation means its share of overall portfolio risk rises sharply. This effect is small when the allocation is small, but above 2% bitcoin’s share of total portfolio risk becomes outsized compared with the average magnificent 7 stock (...) . In an extreme case, should there no longer be any prospect of broad bitcoin adoption, the loss could be the entire 1-2% allocation. We think this is much less likely to happen to a magnificent 7 stock given these companies generate major cash flow and have tangible underlying assets. The upshot? By allocating no more than 2% to bitcoin, investors would: 1) introduce a very different source of return and risk; and 2) manage risk exposure to bitcoin".
We are maxed out across a host of sentiment indicators.
Source: Mike Zaccardi, CFA, CMT 🍖 @MikeZaccardi, Goldman Sachs
So brutal but so true from @psarofagis
Source: @Eric Balchunas
One of the most investing rule: letting your winners run
Source: Compounding Quality
The YOLO crowd is back.
Retail investors were clearly in the driver's seat today, with Bitcoin-sensitive names finishing +19.7% and Goldman Sachs Meme Basket (GSXUMEME Index) closing +7%! Source: Bloomberg, HolgerZ
The share of US consumers expecting higher stock prices over the next 12 months hit 51.4%, the highest on record.
This is even higher than the previous records seen in 2018 and 2000 before the Dot-Com bubble peaked. The percentage has more than DOUBLED over the last 2 years as the stock market has seen one of the largest gains this century. The S&P 500 is now up 40% over the last 12 months marking its 4th best performance since 2000. Stock market sentiment has never been so euphoric. Source: The Kobeissi letter
Investing with intelligence
Our latest research, commentary and market outlooks

