Syz the moment

• Carry trade blowup → BTC -31% • Tariff tantrum → BTC -30% • October 6th through today → bitcoin $BTC -34% Source: Bloomberg, Joe Consorti

Source: Michael Burry Stock Tracker ♟ @burrytracker

Source: Deedy @deedydas

For weeks, everyone kept asking: “Why did the market nuke on Oct 10 with ZERO news?” A thread on X by Bull Theory explains why it happened and how it changes the whole narrative. 1️⃣ MSCI quietly triggered a structural panic On the same evening the crash began, MSCI released a consultation note almost nobody in crypto saw. Their proposal: If a company holds 50%+ of its assets in Bitcoin/digital assets AND behaves like a digital-asset treasury… 👉 it can be excluded from MSCI global indexes. Translation? MicroStrategy and other BTC-heavy companies were suddenly at risk. 2️⃣ Why this is a big deal If MSCI excludes them: • Index funds must sell — instantly No debating. No picking. Pure forced liquidation. • MicroStrategy becomes a target If $MSTR is treated as “fund-like,” indexed funds would be required to reduce or exit. • And when MSTR sells → Bitcoin feels it immediately Weakness in MSTR = lower confidence = higher BTC correlation = more retail panic = liquidation wave. 3️⃣ The Oct 10 cascade suddenly makes sense The market was already fragile: Trump tariffs, a weak Nasdaq, overcrowded BTC leverage, cycle-top fear. MSCI’s note added a new fear: 👉 “If index funds dump MSTR, BTC could get hit next.” That was enough to trigger one of the largest liquidation waves in crypto history. 4️⃣ Then JPMorgan poured gasoline on the fire Three days ago, JPMorgan dropped a bearish note echoing the same MSCI risk — right when: • MSTR weak • BTC weak • Liquidity thin • Sentiment fragile A classic Wall Street playbook: Bearish at the bottom. Bullish at the top. Never random. 5️⃣ Saylor finally enters the chat As fear peaked, Saylor publicly clarified: “We are NOT a fund. We are an operating software company with an innovative Bitcoin treasury strategy.” He highlighted new credit products, ongoing software revenue, and billions in structured instrument issuance. Message received: 👉 MicroStrategy ≠ passive BTC holder. 👉 Index labels don’t define innovation. 6️⃣ What this means going forward ✔ The Oct 10 crash wasn’t random — it aligns perfectly with MSCI’s announcement. ✔ Forced-selling fears created a liquidity shock. ✔ JPMorgan amplified it at the worst possible moment. ✔ Saylor restored confidence, but… ✔ Final MSCI decision comes January 15, 2026. Volatility until then? Highly likely. 🔍 Final Take Oct 10 wasn’t a fundamental breakdown. It was a structural shock hitting a fragile market — and institutions used it to shape sentiment. But the long-term picture hasn’t changed: • Bitcoin adoption strong • Corporate interest rising • Saylor building • Institutions accumulating • ETFs stabilizing • Liquidity cycles returning MSCI isn’t stopping Bitcoin. It just created volatility that smart money is already exploiting. Source: Bull Theory @BullTheoryio zerohedge

~$1.5 trillion needing to be financed across public and private credit markets.

Here's what the sector rotation we've seen looks like underneath the surface. Source: J-C Parets

It means they have more defensibility against the incestuous financing games that’s now the core of the “AI bubble”. She also notes that Gemini’s market share has grown rapidly from 5.6% 12 months ago to 13.7% now, mostly at the expense of ChatGPT - this was before the launch of Gemini 3. Source: The information reporting

Dissenting votes have ticked up in recent months after being somewhat rare. Source: Bloomberg, RBC